WMTI vs. LQTI
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
WMTI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -1.60% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.40M | $2.20M | $1.68M | |
| $616.62K | $528.80K | $959.03K |
WMTI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -4.04% | 9.99% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -1.60% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and LQTI is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
WMTI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -3.41% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -3.17% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -0.98% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 5.19% | +22.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 5.90% | +21.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 5.90% | +21.62% |
WMTI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.84%, more than LQTI's 9.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 8.54% | 7.01% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 28.84% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and LQTI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 28.84%, compared with 8.54% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: REX and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer