WMTI vs. LLII
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from REX. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
WMTI vs. LLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than LLII's 2.07% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMTI vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -0.96% | 9.99% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 2.07% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and LLII is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum LLII drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and LLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -23.96% | +3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -0.71% | -15.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -8.63% | +3.30% |
Volatility
WMTI vs. LLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.90% | 35.58% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 35.58% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 35.58% | -7.68% |
WMTI vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WMTI and LLII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
WMTI vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.01%, while LLII has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.62% | 5.13% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 26.01% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and LLII have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WMTI and LLII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 26.01%, compared with 25.62% for LLII.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and LLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer