WMTI vs. LLII

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from REX. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

WMTI vs. LLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than LLII's -4.28% return.

WMTI

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: -10.43%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LLII

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	2.10%	9.78%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	-4.28%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WMTI and LLII is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

WMTI vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMTI	LLII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.71	+0.08

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum LLII drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and LLII.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMTI	LLII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.24%	-23.96%	+6.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.78%	-6.88%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-9.28%	+5.51%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WMTI	LLII	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	36.42%	-8.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.30%	36.42%	-8.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.30%	36.42%	-8.12%

WMTI vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WMTI and LLII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

WMTI vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, less than LLII's 25.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.95%	5.13%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	21.32%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMTI and LLII in my portfolio?

WMTI and LLII have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WMTI or LLII?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WMTI or LLII?

WMTI and LLII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WMTI or LLII?

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 21.32% for WMTI.