WMTI vs. FCLD
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. WMTI is actively managed, while FCLD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCLD.
Performance
WMTI vs. FCLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FCLD's 31.94% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLD
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 26.87%
- YTD
- 31.94%
- 1Y
- 42.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMTI vs. FCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -0.96% | 9.99% |
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 31.94% | -5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and FCLD is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. FCLD — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCLD
WMTI vs. FCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. FCLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FCLD drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and FCLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -50.85% | +30.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -5.87% | -10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -20.22% | +14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. FCLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.90% | 28.44% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 30.47% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 30.47% | -2.57% |
WMTI vs. FCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. FCLD - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.01%, more than FCLD's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 26.01% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and FCLD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 26.01%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.
WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FCLD is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.39% for FCLD.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and FCLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer