WMKTX vs. GIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about WesMark Tactical Opportunity Fund (WMKTX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX).
WMKTX is managed by WesMark. It was launched on Feb 28, 2017. GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKTX WesMark Tactical Opportunity Fund | -0.47% | 15.41% | 7.19% | 7.10% | -12.40% | 13.90% | 7.01% | 16.62% | -5.20% | 8.33% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 7.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMKTX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's -2.44% return.
WMKTX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- —
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMKTX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMKTX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
WMKTX
GIPIX
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Tactical Opportunity Fund (WMKTX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMKTX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.60 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.93 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 4.10 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMKTX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.64 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMKTX and GIPIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
WMKTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GIPIX's 5.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKTX WesMark Tactical Opportunity Fund | 4.34% | 4.91% | 1.42% | 0.83% | 2.79% | 11.76% | 0.74% | 3.72% | 0.57% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMKTX drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, roughly equal to the maximum GIPIX drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKTX and GIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMKTX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -29.46% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -6.33% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.49% | -20.65% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -5.50% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -3.70% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.65% | +0.15% |
Volatility
WMKTX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
WesMark Tactical Opportunity Fund (WMKTX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.94%. This indicates that WMKTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMKTX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.94% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.60% | 4.78% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 8.09% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.34% | 7.93% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 8.06% | +5.21% |