WMFFX vs. ABALX
Compare and contrast key facts about Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX).
WMFFX is a passively managed fund by American Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 5, 2008. ABALX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jul 26, 1975.
Performance
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | -3.14% | 17.42% | 19.24% | 16.96% | -8.27% | 28.71% | 7.89% | 25.03% | -5.98% | 20.23% |
ABALX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A | -1.12% | 18.45% | 14.63% | 13.65% | -12.13% | 15.75% | 10.85% | 18.60% | -3.35% | 14.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMFFX achieves a -3.14% return, which is significantly lower than ABALX's -1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WMFFX has outperformed ABALX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while ABALX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.17% annualized return.
WMFFX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
ABALX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMFFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMFFX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank
WMFFX
ABALX
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMFFX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.56 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 2.28 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 2.43 | -1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 10.15 | -4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMFFX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.56 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.79 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.87 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMFFX and ABALX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison
WMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, more than ABALX's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | 10.65% | 10.28% | 10.27% | 5.92% | 6.53% | 6.24% | 3.26% | 6.33% | 4.59% | 7.43% | 6.56% | 6.44% |
ABALX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A | 8.39% | 8.27% | 6.87% | 2.05% | 2.30% | 4.30% | 4.35% | 3.49% | 5.49% | 4.72% | 4.24% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMFFX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, which is greater than ABALX's maximum drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFFX and ABALX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMFFX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -40.20% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -7.33% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -18.76% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | -22.34% | -12.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -5.37% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -3.86% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.76% | +0.56% |
Volatility
WMFFX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison
Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) at 3.89%. This indicates that WMFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMFFX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.89% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 6.96% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 11.22% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.13% | 10.45% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 10.63% | +5.70% |