WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L
WMAT.L (SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF) and NDUS.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from State Street tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WMAT.L returned 10.97%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for NDUS.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMAT.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for NDUS.L.
Performance
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WMAT.L is traded in USD, while NDUS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMAT.L achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WMAT.L has underperformed NDUS.L with an annualized return of 10.97%, while NDUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.
WMAT.L
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
NDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 16.89%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMAT.L SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF | 15.22% | 26.36% | -5.73% | 14.40% | -10.02% | 15.63% | 20.67% | 22.51% | -17.30% | 29.05% |
NDUS.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF | 7.90% | 41.14% | 7.67% | 30.46% | -20.96% | 19.75% | 13.28% | 32.09% | -17.27% | 32.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMAT.L and NDUS.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between WMAT.L and NDUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Technology
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Consumer Defensive
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Industrials
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
Communication Services
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Energy
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Financial Services
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Healthcare
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Real Estate
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Utilities
WMAT.L
-
NDUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WMAT.L
NDUS.L
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMAT.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.07 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 3.84 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMAT.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.81 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMAT.L drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.L and NDUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMAT.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -42.33% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | -15.73% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -18.28% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -39.60% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -42.33% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -4.36% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -7.91% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 4.38% | -0.30% |
Volatility
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMAT.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 7.27% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 17.36% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 20.80% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 21.81% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 21.99% | -2.51% |
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMAT.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NDUS.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMAT.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMAT.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMAT.L and NDUS.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NDUS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WMAT.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WMAT.L and 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Find the right allocation for WMAT.L and NDUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer