WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE).
WMAT.L and ZPRV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WMAT.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. ZPRV.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 18, 2015. Both WMAT.L and ZPRV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMAT.L SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 26.36% | -5.73% | 14.40% | -10.02% | 15.63% | 20.67% | 22.51% | -17.30% | 29.05% |
ZPRV.DE SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 4.08% | 16.27% | 7.55% | 22.88% | -10.52% | 36.39% | 7.74% | 24.72% | -15.93% | 9.86% |
Different Trading Currencies
WMAT.L is traded in USD, while ZPRV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRV.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMAT.L achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than ZPRV.DE's 4.08% return.
WMAT.L
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 17.37%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRV.DE
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WMAT.L and ZPRV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Return for Risk
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WMAT.L
ZPRV.DE
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMAT.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.33 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 1.83 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.51 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 9.61 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMAT.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.33 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMAT.L and ZPRV.DE is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMAT.L nor ZPRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMAT.L drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.L and ZPRV.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMAT.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -46.04% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | -16.83% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -31.14% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -2.88% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -8.47% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 2.64% | +1.03% |
Volatility
WMAT.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) at 4.90%. This indicates that WMAT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMAT.L | ZPRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 4.90% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 11.34% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.81% | 20.89% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 21.55% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 23.17% | -3.80% |