PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WMAT.L is traded in USD, while JEDG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JEDG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMAT.L achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly lower than JEDG.L's 74.46% return.


WMAT.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.22%
6M
20.01%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
10.97%

JEDG.L

1D
1.54%
1M
22.67%
YTD
74.46%
6M
98.10%
1Y
208.94%
3Y*
70.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WMAT.L
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF
15.22%26.36%-5.73%14.40%4.31%
JEDG.L
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
74.46%93.99%43.70%12.05%-13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WMAT.L and JEDG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.53

The correlation between WMAT.L and JEDG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMAT.L
WMAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JEDG.L
JEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMAT.LJEDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.57

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

8.47

-6.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

28.03

-20.16

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMAT.L and JEDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMAT.LJEDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

4.60

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.40

-0.82

Drawdowns

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMAT.L drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than JEDG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.L and JEDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMAT.LJEDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-27.38%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.51%

-24.52%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-25.63%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-14.03%

+10.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-8.79%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

7.42%

-3.34%

Volatility

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) is 7.61%, while VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) has a volatility of 19.56%. This indicates that WMAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMAT.LJEDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

19.56%

-11.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

35.71%

-19.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

45.14%

-25.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

34.52%

-14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

34.52%

-15.04%

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMAT.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JEDG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMAT.L vs. JEDG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMAT.L nor JEDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WMAT.L and JEDG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WMAT.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WMAT.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WMAT.L and 0.55% for JEDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMAT.L and JEDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer