WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L
WMAT.L (SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF) and DFNG.L (VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - WMAT.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while DFNG.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WMAT.L returned 15.40%/yr vs 42.81%/yr for DFNG.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WMAT.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFNG.L.
Performance
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WMAT.L is traded in USD, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMAT.L achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly higher than DFNG.L's 3.34% return.
WMAT.L
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
DFNG.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WMAT.L SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF | 15.22% | 26.36% | -5.73% | 10.01% |
DFNG.L VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP | 3.34% | 68.35% | 43.76% | 25.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMAT.L and DFNG.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.39 |
The correlation between WMAT.L and DFNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WMAT.L
DFNG.L
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMAT.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.85 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 2.12 | +5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMAT.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.64 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 2.04 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMAT.L drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.L and DFNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMAT.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -18.77% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | -18.77% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -18.77% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -15.38% | +11.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -3.37% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 7.48% | -3.40% |
Volatility
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) is 7.61%, while VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that WMAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMAT.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 8.27% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 19.67% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 24.92% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 21.33% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 21.33% | -1.85% |
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMAT.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMAT.L vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMAT.L nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMAT.L and DFNG.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WMAT.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WMAT.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.
WMAT.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DFNG.L is Aerospace & Defense. WMAT.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WMAT.L and 0.55% for DFNG.L.
Find the right allocation for WMAT.L and DFNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer