WLTG vs. GSG
WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - WLTG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by WealthTrust, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. WLTG is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WLTG returned 21.86%/yr vs 14.41%/yr for GSG. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
WLTG vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.35% return.
WLTG
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 28.24%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
WLTG vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 7.61% | 24.55% | 26.90% | 17.00% | -22.64% | 1.43% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 32.35% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLTG and GSG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between WLTG and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLTG vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
WLTG
GSG
WLTG vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLTG | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 1.85 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 6.29 | +3.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLTG vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLTG | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.14% | -89.62% | +64.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -18.81% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -18.81% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -60.04% | +59.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -63.69% | +54.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 5.51% | -3.31% |
Volatility
WLTG vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is 4.16%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that WLTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLTG | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 7.35% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 21.50% | -10.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.12% | 23.48% | -9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 22.80% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 22.00% | -6.83% |
WLTG vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WLTG and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
WLTG vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 4.12% | 4.43% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.44% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLTG and GSG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to WLTG (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLTG dropped -25.14% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 3-year performance, WLTG leads with 21.86% vs 14.41% for GSG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, WLTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WLTG has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WLTG and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
WLTG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WealthTrust and iShares.
WLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLTG and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer