WLTG vs. ESN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. WLTG is actively managed, while ESN is passively managed. Over the past year, WLTG returned 22.07% vs 27.64% for ESN. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.

Performance

WLTG vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 16.65% return.

WLTG

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 5.49%
• YTD: 8.11%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.17%

ESN

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 12.11%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	$2.17M	$1.60M	$1.63M
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	$600.93K	$345.27K	$433.54K

WLTG vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	8.11%	24.55%	-1.08%
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	16.65%	16.52%	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between WLTG and ESN is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024	0.70

The correlation between WLTG and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WLTG vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 61
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ESN

ESN Risk / Return Rank: 93
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WLTG vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WLTG	ESN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.65	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.65	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	4.12	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	16.52	-7.46

WLTG vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the ESN Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLTG and ESN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WLTG vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and ESN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLTG	ESN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.14%	-13.60%	-11.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-6.42%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.53%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-1.81%	-6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.60%	+0.62%

Volatility

WLTG vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison

WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.65%. This indicates that WLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLTG	ESN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	2.65%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	7.51%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.32%	9.98%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	13.04%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.14%	13.04%	+2.10%

WLTG vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLTG vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than ESN's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	0.78%	0.91%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.10%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLTG and ESN in my portfolio?

WLTG and ESN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLTG or ESN?

WLTG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to ESN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLTG dropped -25.14% vs ESN's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, WLTG or ESN?

On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 27.64% vs 22.07% for WLTG. On fees, ESN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WLTG or ESN?

Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLTG or ESN?

ESN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WLTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLTG or ESN?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.78% for ESN.

What is the main difference between WLTG and ESN?

They also come from different issuers: WealthTrust and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WLTG and 0.70% for ESN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.