WLTG vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLTG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by WealthTrust, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. WLTG is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WLTG returned 22.76%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

WLTG vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.71% return.

WLTG

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 5.87%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 24.44%
• 3Y*: 22.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLTG vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	5.87%	24.55%	26.90%	9.84%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.71%	4.23%	5.26%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WLTG and CLIP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	-0.02

Return for Risk

WLTG vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 57
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 66

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLTG vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WLTG	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	17.84	-16.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	80.86	-78.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	26.35	-25.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	141.67	-139.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.26	1,281.30	-1,270.04

WLTG vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLTG and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WLTG vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLTG	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.14%	-0.08%	-25.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-0.03%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.12%	-0.08%	-17.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	0.00%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	-0.00%	-8.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	0.00%	+2.18%

Volatility

WLTG vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that WLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLTG	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	0.07%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.02%	0.15%	+10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	0.22%	+13.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	0.44%	+14.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	0.44%	+14.77%

WLTG vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLTG vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than CLIP's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.90%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%	0.00%	0.00%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.18%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLTG and CLIP in my portfolio?

WLTG and CLIP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLTG or CLIP?

WLTG has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLTG dropped -25.14% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, WLTG or CLIP?

On 3-year performance, WLTG leads with 22.76% vs 4.64% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WLTG or CLIP?

Over the 3-year period, WLTG has performed better with a 22.76% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLTG or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WLTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLTG or CLIP?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.90% for CLIP.

What is the main difference between WLTG and CLIP?

WLTG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WealthTrust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WLTG and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.84 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.