WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L
WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and WQDV.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDS.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while WQDV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDS.L returned 8.13%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for WQDV.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for WQDV.L.
Performance
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while WQDV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WQDV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than WQDV.L's 14.59% return.
WLDS.L
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
WQDV.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 15.41% | 11.75% | 8.63% | 11.26% | -8.89% | 16.71% | 12.54% | 20.41% | -31.05% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 14.59% | 15.31% | 11.67% | 11.37% | 4.12% | 17.09% | -3.01% | 18.06% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS.L and WQDV.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between WLDS.L and WQDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Technology
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Financial Services
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Healthcare
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Real Estate
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Basic Materials
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Energy
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Consumer Defensive
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Communication Services
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Utilities
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
WLDS.L
WQDV.L
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDS.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.49 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 4.59 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.95 | 16.93 | -0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, which is greater than WQDV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and WQDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDS.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.18% | -24.64% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -6.65% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.53% | -14.78% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -14.78% | -6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -2.98% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.81% | +0.28% |
Volatility
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDS.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.01% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 9.17% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 11.56% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 12.66% | +7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 14.11% | +8.34% |
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDS.L vs. WQDV.L - Dividend Comparison
WLDS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.81% | 2.31% | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.81% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDS.L and WQDV.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WLDS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WLDS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDV.L.
WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while WQDV.L is Global Equities. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WLDS.L and 0.38% for WQDV.L.
Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and WQDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer