PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while FWEA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FWEA.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly higher than FWEA.DE's 10.16% return.


WLDS.L

1D
0.13%
1M
5.61%
YTD
17.04%
6M
16.18%
1Y
35.51%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

FWEA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.16%
6M
10.85%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
17.04%11.75%8.63%11.87%
FWEA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc
10.16%23.64%14.01%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDS.L and FWEA.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.74

The correlation between WLDS.L and FWEA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDS.L
WLDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FWEA.DE
FWEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLDS.LFWEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

3.43

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.43

13.74

+3.68

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDS.L and FWEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, which is greater than FWEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and FWEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDS.LFWEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-15.32%

-27.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-8.70%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-1.69%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.17%

-0.08%

Volatility

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDS.LFWEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.67%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

9.37%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

11.77%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

12.61%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

12.61%

+9.82%

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FWEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDS.L vs. FWEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDS.L nor FWEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDS.L and FWEA.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WLDS.L.

WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FWEA.DE is Global Equities. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WLDS.L and 0.20% for FWEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and FWEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer