PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDR vs. WRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WLDR vs. WRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WLDR vs. WRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
6.74%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.47%
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
-3.11%27.72%13.46%34.85%-19.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than WRND's -3.11% return.


WLDR

1D
1.91%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
6.74%
6M
9.34%
1Y
42.56%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*

WRND

1D
4.07%
1M
-6.90%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WLDR vs. WRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than WRND's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WLDR vs. WRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

WRND
WRND Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. WRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDRWRNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.12

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

1.67

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.75

+1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.36

6.86

+8.50

WLDR vs. WRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the WRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and WRND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDRWRNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.12

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.58

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and WRND is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WLDR vs. WRND - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than WRND's 1.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
8.56%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
1.18%1.29%1.15%2.06%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. WRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than WRND's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and WRND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDRWRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-27.16%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-12.75%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-8.87%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-6.16%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.26%

-0.45%

Volatility

WLDR vs. WRND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) is 6.86%, while IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that WLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WLDRWRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

8.10%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

13.20%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

20.59%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.78%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

18.78%

+2.22%