WLDR vs. RGEF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WLDR is passively managed, while RGEF is actively managed. Over the past year, WLDR returned 60.09% vs 31.38% for RGEF. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RGEF.

Performance

WLDR vs. RGEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 31.09% return, which is significantly higher than RGEF's 14.44% return.

WLDR

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 13.39%
• YTD: 31.09%
• 6M: 37.06%
• 1Y: 60.09%
• 3Y*: 33.25%
• 5Y*: 18.51%
• 10Y*: —

RGEF

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 5.07%
• YTD: 14.44%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 31.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. RGEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	31.09%	31.24%	0.55%
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	14.44%	25.37%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and RGEF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.74

The correlation between WLDR and RGEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WLDR vs. RGEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 94
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RGEF

RGEF Risk / Return Rank: 68
RGEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RGEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RGEF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RGEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RGEF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. RGEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLDR	RGEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.04	2.29	+1.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.33	3.20	+2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.41	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.84	3.25	+3.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.78	14.56	+13.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDR vs. RGEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is higher than the RGEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and RGEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLDR	RGEF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.04	2.29	+1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	1.47	-0.86

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. RGEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than RGEF's maximum drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and RGEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDR	RGEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.69%	-16.01%	-28.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-9.95%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-1.79%	-6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.22%	-0.04%

Volatility

WLDR vs. RGEF - Volatility Comparison

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) at 4.31%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDR	RGEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	4.31%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	11.12%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.94%	13.78%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	16.81%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	16.81%	+4.13%

WLDR vs. RGEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than RGEF's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDR vs. RGEF - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than RGEF's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	0.88%	0.92%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	6.97%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDR and RGEF in my portfolio?

WLDR and RGEF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLDR or RGEF?

WLDR has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to RGEF (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs RGEF's -16.01%.

Which ETF is better, WLDR or RGEF?

On 1-year performance, WLDR leads with 60.09% vs 31.38% for RGEF. On fees, RGEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, RGEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WLDR or RGEF?

Over the 1-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 60.09% return vs 31.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLDR or RGEF?

RGEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLDR or RGEF?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 0.88% for RGEF.

What is the main difference between WLDR and RGEF?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.55% for RGEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.