WLDR vs. IMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL).
WLDR and IMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WLDR is a passively managed fund by Regents Park Funds that tracks the performance of the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. Both WLDR and IMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WLDR vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WLDR vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 6.74% | 31.24% | 22.74% | 18.93% | -10.44% | 16.60% |
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 8.63% | 30.89% | -3.57% | 25.51% | -17.32% | 6.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 8.63% return.
WLDR
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 42.56%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- —
IMFL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WLDR vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WLDR vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank
WLDR
IMFL
WLDR vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLDR | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.09 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.71 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.96 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.36 | 11.45 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLDR | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.09 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDR and IMFL is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WLDR vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison
WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than IMFL's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 8.56% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% |
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.11% | 2.88% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.35% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WLDR vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than IMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and IMFL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDR | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.69% | -33.26% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -11.77% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -33.26% | +9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -7.51% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.79% | -7.37% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.04% | -0.23% |
Volatility
WLDR vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) is 6.86%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that WLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WLDR | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 7.34% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 11.89% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 16.63% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 15.90% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 15.87% | +5.13% |