PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDR vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDR vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 30.43% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.71% return.


WLDR

1D
-1.77%
1M
6.66%
YTD
30.43%
6M
29.99%
1Y
55.53%
3Y*
31.99%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*

FIXT

1D
0.14%
1M
1.07%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and FIXT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.33

WLDR vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WLDR
FIXT

Technology

37.0%

-

Financial Services

12.2%

-

Communication Services

10.1%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Healthcare

8.0%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

WLDR
37.0%
FIXT

-

Financial Services

WLDR
12.2%
FIXT

-

Communication Services

WLDR
10.1%
FIXT

-

Industrials

WLDR
8.1%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

WLDR
8.0%
FIXT
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

WLDR
7.9%
FIXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

WLDR
5.9%
FIXT

-

Energy

WLDR
3.8%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

WLDR
3.1%
FIXT

-

Utilities

WLDR
2.4%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

WLDR
1.6%
FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDR vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLDRFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.22

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.30

1.56

+4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.45

4.33

+20.12

WLDR vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and FIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDRFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-3.02%

-41.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-3.02%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.42%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-0.75%

-7.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.08%

+1.20%

Volatility

WLDR vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.91%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDRFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

0.91%

+6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

2.48%

+10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

3.77%

+12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

3.74%

+13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

3.74%

+17.26%

WLDR vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDR vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than FIXT's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.52%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
7.13%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDR and FIXT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLDR has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

On 1-year performance, WLDR leads with 55.53% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, WLDR is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 55.53% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WLDR is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 5.52% for FIXT.

WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.75% for FIXT.

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDR and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer