WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L
WLDL.L (Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WLDL.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while TDGB.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDL.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WLDL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WLDL.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDL.L achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.
WLDL.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDL.L Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist | 10.10% | 12.59% | 21.18% | 18.07% | -8.98% | 24.03% | 11.65% | 17.67% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.92% | 30.88% | 10.65% | 9.06% | 22.49% | 19.59% | -5.61% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDL.L and TDGB.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019 | 0.47 |
The correlation between WLDL.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Communication Services
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Healthcare
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Energy
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Utilities
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Real Estate
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
WLDL.L
TDGB.L
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLDL.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.59 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 6.26 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 20.72 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLDL.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | 3.15 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.55 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDL.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDL.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -29.60% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -4.66% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.91% | -12.41% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -12.41% | -6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -1.47% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -3.70% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.41% | +0.17% |
Volatility
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDL.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.49% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 7.01% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 9.28% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 11.42% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 14.44% | +4.06% |
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDL.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
WLDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLDL.L Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.15% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.57% | 2.41% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDL.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WLDL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WLDL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
WLDL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WLDL.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for WLDL.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer