PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIW vs. ARDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIW vs. ARDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (WIW) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIW achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than ARDC's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, WIW has underperformed ARDC with an annualized return of 3.87%, while ARDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.42% annualized return.


WIW

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.71%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
3.87%

ARDC

1D
0.24%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
-1.69%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIW vs. ARDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIW
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
1.59%13.17%3.83%5.10%-25.30%17.66%11.46%18.27%-7.57%6.46%
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
-0.59%-3.10%21.05%32.35%-22.21%23.12%2.56%21.26%-8.80%17.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WIW and ARDC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIW vs. ARDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIW
WIW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
WIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ARDC
ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIW vs. ARDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (WIW) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WIWARDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.98

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.11

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

-0.22

+3.96

WIW vs. ARDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIW Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the ARDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIW and ARDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WIW vs. ARDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIW drawdown since its inception was -29.49%, smaller than the maximum ARDC drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIW and ARDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIWARDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.49%

-45.40%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-15.57%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.65%

-19.78%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-26.48%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.49%

-45.40%

+15.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-8.16%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-6.65%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

7.64%

-6.26%

Volatility

WIW vs. ARDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (WIW) is 1.75%, while Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that WIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIWARDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

2.47%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

7.28%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

9.57%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

13.80%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.98%

16.87%

-6.89%

Dividends

WIW vs. ARDC - Dividend Comparison

WIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, less than ARDC's 10.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
10.77%10.19%9.33%9.85%10.31%7.16%8.40%8.40%9.35%7.58%8.45%10.51%
WIW
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
8.98%8.68%8.78%10.38%11.81%6.93%3.20%3.74%4.26%3.70%3.61%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIW and ARDC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARDC has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to WIW (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIW dropped -29.49% vs ARDC's -45.40%.

WIW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIW and ARDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer