WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS
WITS.AS (iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WITS.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WITS.AS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WITS.AS
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 47.95%
- 3Y*
- 31.66%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 23.70% | 22.39% | 14.60% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WITS.AS and DFND.AS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
WITS.AS
DFND.AS
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WITS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WITS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WITS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | — | — |
Volatility
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WITS.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.75% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.61% | — | — |
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WITS.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WITS.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
WITS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while DFND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WITS.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WITS.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WITS.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFND.AS.
WITS.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. WITS.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WITS.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for WITS.AS and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer