WITS.AS vs. AMZN
WITS.AS (iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, WITS.AS returned 20.38%/yr vs 9.62%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WITS.AS achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 9.95% return.
WITS.AS
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 47.95%
- 3Y*
- 31.66%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 23.70% | 22.39% | 28.01% | 60.19% | -33.27% | 30.12% | 44.49% | 12.11% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 9.95% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WITS.AS and AMZN is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WITS.AS vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
WITS.AS
AMZN
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WITS.AS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.04 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 2.49 | +6.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WITS.AS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 0.75 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.27 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.57 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WITS.AS drawdown since its inception was -39.08%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WITS.AS and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WITS.AS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.08% | -94.40% | +55.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -21.74% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | -30.88% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.08% | -56.15% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -7.71% | +5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -28.12% | +19.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 9.03% | -3.83% |
Volatility
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) have volatilities of 7.12% and 7.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WITS.AS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 7.43% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 20.40% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 30.03% | -10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 35.51% | -11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 32.46% | -7.85% |
Dividends
WITS.AS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
WITS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WITS.AS and AMZN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WITS.AS and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer