WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WIND.AS (SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF) and XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WIND.AS returned 12.19%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for XDWI.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WIND.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWI.L.

Performance

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WIND.AS is traded in EUR, while XDWI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WIND.AS having a 12.26% return and XDWI.L slightly higher at 12.49%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: WIND.AS at 12.19% and XDWI.L at 12.19%.

WIND.AS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

XDWI.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 14.98%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WIND.AS SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF	12.26%	11.18%	20.83%	19.00%	-7.88%	25.94%	2.18%	29.89%	-10.56%	9.61%
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C	12.49%	10.62%	20.52%	19.62%	-7.31%	24.77%	2.63%	30.04%	-10.83%	9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between WIND.AS and XDWI.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016	0.87

The correlation between WIND.AS and XDWI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIND.AS

WIND.AS Risk / Return Rank: 41
WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WIND.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
WIND.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
WIND.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
WIND.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

XDWI.L

XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WIND.AS	XDWI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.93	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.15	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	7.52	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIND.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIND.AS and XDWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WIND.AS	XDWI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.77	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.70	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.69	-0.04

Drawdowns

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIND.AS drawdown since its inception was -38.13%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWI.L drawdown of -38.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIND.AS and XDWI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIND.AS	XDWI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.13%	-38.09%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-9.31%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.94%	-18.66%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	-18.66%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.13%	-38.09%	-0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-1.12%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-4.41%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.67%	-0.10%

Volatility

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WIND.AS) is 4.69%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that WIND.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WIND.AS	XDWI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	5.04%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	12.84%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	15.62%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.26%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	17.53%	+1.20%

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIND.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWI.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIND.AS vs. XDWI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WIND.AS nor XDWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIND.AS and XDWI.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, WIND.AS and XDWI.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WIND.AS or XDWI.L?

On fees, XDWI.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIND.AS or XDWI.L?

XDWI.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WIND.AS.

What is the main difference between WIND.AS and XDWI.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WIND.AS and 0.25% for XDWI.L.