WINC.AS vs. SCHD
WINC.AS (iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WINC.AS is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by iShares, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. WINC.AS is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past year, WINC.AS returned 22.80% vs 27.19% for SCHD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WINC.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINC.AS achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.44% return.
WINC.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.61% | 21.56% | 8.10% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 22.44% | 4.34% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINC.AS and SCHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINC.AS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
WINC.AS
SCHD
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WINC.AS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 5.92 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 14.46 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINC.AS drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINC.AS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINC.AS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -33.37% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.77% | -4.61% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -3.30% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.89% | -0.24% |
Volatility
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) is 2.29%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that WINC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINC.AS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 4.10% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 8.05% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 11.04% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 14.40% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 16.71% | -4.20% |
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WINC.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
WINC.AS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than SCHD's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.17% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 12.44% | 9.38% | 4.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WINC.AS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WINC.AS.
WINC.AS is categorized as Global Equity Income, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WINC.AS and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for WINC.AS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer