PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS).

WINC.AS and CNDX.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WINC.AS is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. CNDX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010.

Performance

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc		-2.66%21.56%8.92%
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		-7.82%20.42%17.47%
Different Trading Currencies

WINC.AS is traded in USD, while CNDX.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CNDX.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINC.AS achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.AS's -7.82% return.

WINC.AS

1D
0.69%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-2.66%
6M
1.96%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CNDX.AS

1D
1.04%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
-7.82%
6M
-4.60%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
18.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with WINC.AS:
WINC.AS vs. JEPQWINC.AS vs. JEPG.LWINC.AS vs. JEQP.LWINC.AS vs. SWDA.LWINC.AS vs. QQQIWINC.AS vs. VWRL.ASWINC.AS vs. TDGB.L
Often compared with CNDX.AS:
CNDX.AS vs. QQQMCNDX.AS vs. CNDX.LCNDX.AS vs. CSNDX.MICNDX.AS vs. CSPX.ASCNDX.AS vs. ANXU.LCNDX.AS vs. EXXT.DECNDX.AS vs. NQSE.DE

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINC.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.

CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc

Return for Risk

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WINC.AS
WINC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS
CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WINC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.72

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.29

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

9.06

-0.19

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINC.AS and CNDX.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WINC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.59

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.91

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.89

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between WINC.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison

WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc		9.72%9.38%4.88%
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINC.AS drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.AS drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINC.AS and CNDX.AS.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

WINC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-31.21%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-13.20%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-31.21%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-10.00%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-5.49%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.30%

-1.23%

Volatility

WINC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

WINC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

4.65%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

11.43%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

20.07%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

20.53%

-6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

19.82%

-5.93%