WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L
WINC.AS (iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc) and AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - WINC.AS is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by iShares, while AMDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WINC.AS returned 21.61% vs 100.82% for AMDI.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WINC.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AMDI.L.
Performance
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINC.AS achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMDI.L's 81.71% return.
WINC.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.13%
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- 6M
- 73.37%
- YTD
- 81.71%
- 1Y
- 100.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19,255.63%
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.43% | 11.35% |
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 81.71% | 12,701.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINC.AS and AMDI.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
WINC.AS
AMDI.L
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) and IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WINC.AS | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.13 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 3.62 | +9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINC.AS drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum AMDI.L drawdown of -47.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINC.AS and AMDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINC.AS | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -47.34% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.77% | -47.34% | +40.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -16.92% | +15.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -21.04% | +19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 27.81% | -26.16% |
Volatility
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) is 2.63%, while IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that WINC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINC.AS | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 25.65% | -23.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 47.18% | -38.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.87% | 75.40% | -64.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 9,750.24% | -9,737.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 9,750.24% | -9,737.72% |
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WINC.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
WINC.AS vs. AMDI.L - Dividend Comparison
WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, less than AMDI.L's 52.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 52.97% | 8.85% | 0.00% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.88% | 9.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WINC.AS and AMDI.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WINC.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WINC.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMDI.L.
WINC.AS is categorized as Global Equity Income, while AMDI.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WINC.AS and 0.55% for AMDI.L.
Find the right allocation for WINC.AS and AMDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer