WIMA vs. TACK
WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WIMA is passively managed, while TACK is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TACK.
Performance
WIMA vs. TACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACK
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | -0.12% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIMA and TACK is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIMA vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank
WIMA
TACK
WIMA vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIMA | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.61 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
WIMA vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and TACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIMA | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -14.49% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.21% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -4.23% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
WIMA vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIMA | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 9.46% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 11.23% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 11.23% | +2.31% |
WIMA vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
WIMA vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison
WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIMA and TACK have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TACK.
TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.76% for TACK.
Find the right allocation for WIMA and TACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer