WIMA vs. ARP
WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and ARP (Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WIMA is passively managed, while ARP is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ARP.
Performance
WIMA vs. ARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | -0.12% |
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIMA and ARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIMA vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank
WIMA
ARP
WIMA vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIMA | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 1.36 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
WIMA vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum ARP drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and ARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIMA | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -10.13% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.29% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -1.81% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
WIMA vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIMA | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 13.53% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 10.06% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 10.06% | +3.48% |
WIMA vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
WIMA vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison
WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 5.86% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 2.67% | 0.06% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIMA and ARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.
ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 1.42% for ARP.
Find the right allocation for WIMA and ARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer