PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. SLVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than SLVIX's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has underperformed SLVIX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while SLVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


WHGLX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.75%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
9.57%

SLVIX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.27%
YTD
13.57%
6M
17.08%
1Y
37.33%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
5.81%5.73%10.52%8.91%-5.64%23.73%2.71%27.34%-6.18%20.86%
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
13.57%28.02%12.90%5.90%-0.78%26.68%6.49%26.89%-12.03%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and SLVIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006

0.92

The correlation between WHGLX and SLVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. SLVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVIX
SLVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGLXSLVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

3.26

-1.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

4.52

-2.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.26

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

17.52

-10.72

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the SLVIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and SLVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGLXSLVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

3.26

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.75

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.72

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.45

-0.01

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum SLVIX drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and SLVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXSLVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-59.63%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-9.00%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-14.71%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-18.35%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-41.46%

+5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-8.29%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.18%

-0.36%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 2.47%, while Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXSLVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

3.25%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

8.83%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

11.76%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

15.90%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

18.68%

-2.44%

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVIX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. SLVIX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.71%, more than SLVIX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
7.37%8.37%3.62%3.75%1.62%5.95%7.47%6.97%5.02%3.73%6.95%4.71%
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
20.71%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGLX and SLVIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to WHGLX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs SLVIX's -59.63%.

SLVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGLX and SLVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer