PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 11.57% return.


WHGLX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
5.55%
6M
4.89%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.81%

AVERX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
11.57%
6M
9.97%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
5.55%9.64%
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
11.57%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and AVERX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHGLXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.97

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

2.63

+3.54

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -13.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-13.20%

-37.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-13.20%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-13.20%

+12.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-5.91%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

4.84%

-3.01%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 3.29%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

5.22%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

14.63%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

19.54%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

18.92%

-5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

18.92%

-2.66%

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.76%, more than AVERX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.37%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
20.76%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGLX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to WHGLX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs AVERX's -13.20%.

WHGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGLX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer