WHGHX vs. SCFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WHGHX (Westwood High Income Fund) and SCFIX (Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, WHGHX returned 6.23%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for SCFIX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WHGHX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for SCFIX.

Performance

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGHX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than SCFIX's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGHX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 6.23%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.

WHGHX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: 13.52%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: 4.83%
• 10Y*: 6.23%

SCFIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 5.44%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WHGHX Westwood High Income Fund	4.46%	9.60%	9.73%	11.53%	-11.10%	7.24%	14.89%	9.45%	0.36%	4.20%
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	1.42%	7.02%	6.11%	9.24%	-2.52%	5.08%	3.36%	7.61%	0.85%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGHX and SCFIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.68

The correlation between WHGHX and SCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WHGHX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGHX

WHGHX Risk / Return Rank: 89
WHGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
WHGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
WHGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
WHGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WHGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SCFIX

SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 95
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WHGHX	SCFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	3.36	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.73	5.51	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.83	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	4.90	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	26.53	-8.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the SCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGHX and SCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WHGHX	SCFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12	3.36	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	1.62	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	1.34	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.34	-0.33

Drawdowns

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGHX drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGHX and SCFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WHGHX	SCFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-13.08%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-1.11%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.76%	-1.72%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.88%	-6.30%	-9.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.11%	-13.08%	-5.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-0.51%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	0.21%	+0.56%

Volatility

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that WHGHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WHGHX	SCFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	0.50%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.61%	1.30%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.45%	1.63%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.29%	2.77%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.94%	3.28%	+2.66%

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGHX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

WHGHX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison

WHGHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than SCFIX's 5.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	5.32%	5.54%	5.85%	5.21%	3.86%	4.93%	3.24%	3.78%	3.87%	3.09%	3.07%	3.38%
WHGHX Westwood High Income Fund	5.58%	6.27%	5.81%	5.23%	4.79%	3.45%	3.54%	4.39%	4.79%	4.58%	4.07%	4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WHGHX and SCFIX in my portfolio?

WHGHX and SCFIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WHGHX or SCFIX?

WHGHX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to SCFIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGHX dropped -18.11% vs SCFIX's -13.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.