PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WHEA.L is traded in USD, while SWLD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SWLD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHEA.L achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SWLD.L's 10.55% return.


WHEA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
3.82%
6M
-0.33%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
8.14%

SWLD.L

1D
0.50%
1M
0.65%
6M
9.49%
YTD
10.55%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WHEA.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
1.40%15.24%1.05%3.54%-5.55%20.41%12.93%13.65%
SWLD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
10.55%21.35%19.19%23.90%-17.89%22.54%15.43%-13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between WHEA.L and SWLD.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between WHEA.L and SWLD.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHEA.L
WHEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WHEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLD.L
SWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHEA.LSWLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.62

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

11.16

-7.20

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHEA.L and SWLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHEA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.20%, smaller than the maximum SWLD.L drawdown of -40.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.L and SWLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHEA.LSWLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.20%

-40.77%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-8.57%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-18.97%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-26.17%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

0.00%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-9.03%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

2.02%

+2.25%

Volatility

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) at 2.86%. This indicates that WHEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHEA.LSWLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

2.86%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

9.03%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

11.59%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

20.51%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

22.28%

-7.55%

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHEA.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHEA.L vs. SWLD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WHEA.L nor SWLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WHEA.L and SWLD.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WHEA.L.

WHEA.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SWLD.L is Global Equities. WHEA.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF, while SWLD.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WHEA.L and 0.12% for SWLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHEA.L and SWLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer