SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L).
SWLD.L and LGGG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SWLD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. LGGG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. Both SWLD.L and LGGG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWLD.L or LGGG.L.
Key characteristics
| SWLD.L | LGGG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.53% | 8.57% |
| 1Y Return | 15.18% | 15.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.15% | 7.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.42% | 11.23% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.45 | 1.42 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.42% | 10.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.06% | -25.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.72% | -4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLD.L and LGGG.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWLD.L having a 8.53% return and LGGG.L slightly higher at 8.57%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWLD.L nor LGGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than LGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLD.L and LGGG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWLD.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.