PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WHCS.AS is traded in USD, while XAMB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XAMB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHCS.AS achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than XAMB.DE's 11.80% return.


WHCS.AS

1D
2.89%
1M
3.09%
YTD
-3.10%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*

XAMB.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
5.58%
YTD
11.80%
6M
13.43%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
-3.10%15.82%-5.39%3.78%-3.40%20.66%13.10%11.49%
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
11.80%15.43%8.82%24.47%-22.34%25.66%18.14%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHCS.AS
WHCS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XAMB.DE
XAMB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHCS.ASXAMB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.26

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

8.74

-6.68

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHCS.ASXAMB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.63

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.55

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.71

-0.24

Drawdowns

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHCS.AS drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum XAMB.DE drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHCS.ASXAMB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-32.32%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-10.05%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-18.91%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-29.86%

+10.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

0.00%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-6.17%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

2.60%

+1.87%

Volatility

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) at 4.30%. This indicates that WHCS.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAMB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHCS.ASXAMB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.30%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

10.88%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

13.90%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

16.45%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

17.51%

-1.13%

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHCS.AS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XAMB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHCS.AS vs. XAMB.DE - Dividend Comparison

WHCS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while XAMB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
1.08%1.05%1.04%1.15%1.08%1.08%1.20%0.10%
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAMB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAMB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WHCS.AS.

WHCS.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XAMB.DE is Global Equities. WHCS.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XAMB.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for WHCS.AS and 0.18% for XAMB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHCS.AS and XAMB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer