WHCE.L vs. CH5.L
WHCE.L (Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and CH5.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WHCE.L tracks the S&P World ESG Enhanced Health Care Index while CH5.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WHCE.L returned 5.96%/yr vs -24.60%/yr for CH5.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WHCE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CH5.L.
Performance
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WHCE.L is traded in USD, while CH5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CH5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHCE.L achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than CH5.L's -3.25% return.
WHCE.L
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CH5.L
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -3.25%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- -24.60%
- 5Y*
- -14.34%
- 10Y*
- -3.87%
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WHCE.L Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -4.23% | 15.94% | 1.55% | 2.96% |
CH5.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF | -3.25% | 20.29% | -63.85% | -0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHCE.L and CH5.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between WHCE.L and CH5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L — Risk / Return Rank
WHCE.L
CH5.L
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHCE.L | CH5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.49 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 1.12 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHCE.L | CH5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.39 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.03 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHCE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum CH5.L drawdown of -69.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCE.L and CH5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHCE.L | CH5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -69.78% | +49.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.46% | -14.33% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -69.78% | +49.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.25% | -62.13% | +54.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -15.51% | +9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 6.27% | -1.51% |
Volatility
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) is 5.21%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that WHCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CH5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHCE.L | CH5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 5.67% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 12.87% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 17.85% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 32.84% | -18.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 25.98% | -12.00% |
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CH5.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WHCE.L vs. CH5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WHCE.L nor CH5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WHCE.L and CH5.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WHCE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WHCE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CH5.L.
WHCE.L tracks S&P World ESG Enhanced Health Care Index, while CH5.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WHCE.L and 0.25% for CH5.L.
Find the right allocation for WHCE.L and CH5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer