PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHCA.AS vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WHCA.AS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WHCA.AS is traded in EUR, while XLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHCA.AS achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.23% return.


WHCA.AS

1D
2.82%
1M
3.91%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
10Y*

XLV

1D
2.93%
1M
5.36%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WHCA.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-2.07%2.44%0.95%0.93%1.99%3.68%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.23%0.92%9.24%-0.99%3.99%5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WHCA.AS and XLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.56

The correlation between WHCA.AS and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHCA.AS vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHCA.AS
WHCA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WHCA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHCA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHCA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WHCA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHCA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WHCA.AS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHCA.ASXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.17

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.31

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

3.26

-1.69

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHCA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHCA.AS and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHCA.ASXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

0.95

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.60

-0.47

Drawdowns

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHCA.AS drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCA.AS and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHCA.ASXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-31.02%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-10.87%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-22.26%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.64%

-6.79%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-6.48%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

4.36%

+0.36%

Volatility

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WHCA.AS) is 5.00%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that WHCA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHCA.ASXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

5.36%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.94%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

15.00%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

15.11%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

17.33%

-2.61%

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHCA.AS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WHCA.AS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

WHCA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WHCA.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHCA.AS and XLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WHCA.AS.

WHCA.AS tracks MSCI World Health Care Advanced Select 20 35 Capped, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WHCA.AS and 0.08% for XLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHCA.AS and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer