PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WH2E.DE having a -3.24% return and WELS.DE slightly lower at -3.35%.


WH2E.DE

1D
2.76%
1M
4.70%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-2.41%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
10Y*

WELS.DE

1D
2.97%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-3.35%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WH2E.DE
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc
-3.24%2.78%7.94%1.68%
WELS.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-3.35%1.05%7.20%2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WH2E.DE and WELS.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.97

The correlation between WH2E.DE and WELS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WH2E.DE
WH2E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WH2E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WH2E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WH2E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WH2E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WH2E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WELS.DE
WELS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WH2E.DEWELS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.09

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.56

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

1.30

+0.85

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WH2E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WH2E.DE and WELS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WH2E.DEWELS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.47

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.22

-0.02

Drawdowns

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WH2E.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, roughly equal to the maximum WELS.DE drawdown of -23.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH2E.DE and WELS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WH2E.DEWELS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-23.13%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-12.35%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-23.13%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-12.08%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-7.30%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

5.34%

-0.61%

Volatility

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WH2E.DEWELS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.27%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

10.22%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

14.60%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.59%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.59%

+0.32%

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WH2E.DE and WELS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WH2E.DE vs. WELS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WH2E.DE nor WELS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, WH2E.DE and WELS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WH2E.DE and WELS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

WH2E.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care, while WELS.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WH2E.DE and WELS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer