WGMI vs. UUP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. WGMI is actively managed, while UUP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WGMI returned 43.46%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for UUP. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

WGMI vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 36.58% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.

WGMI

• 1D: -5.82%
• 1M: -20.77%
• 6M: 9.97%
• YTD: 36.58%
• 1Y: 110.94%
• 3Y*: 43.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UUP

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.97%
• 6M: 4.47%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: 3.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	36.58%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-82.94%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	5.44%	-4.99%	13.50%	3.63%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and UUP is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	-0.25

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 36

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 51
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGMI	UUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.38	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	1.99	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.28	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.37	6.26	-1.90

WGMI vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and UUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	UUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-22.19%	-63.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-3.65%	-47.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	-10.05%	-52.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.50%	-1.26%	-26.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.15%	-8.88%	-33.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.51%	1.33%	+24.18%

Volatility

WGMI vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	UUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.33%	1.45%	+20.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.04%	4.34%	+51.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.66%	6.03%	+71.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.54%	7.22%	+74.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.54%	6.90%	+74.64%

WGMI vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WGMI and UUP have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

WGMI vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.25%	3.43%	4.48%	6.44%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.03%	1.08%	0.10%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and UUP in my portfolio?

WGMI and UUP have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGMI or UUP?

WGMI has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs UUP's -22.19%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or UUP?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 43.46% vs 5.86% for UUP. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or UUP?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 43.46% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or UUP?

WGMI and UUP have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or UUP?

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and UUP?

WGMI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.