WGMI vs. CEPI
WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WGMI returned 294.61% vs 34.07% for CEPI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CEPI.
Performance
WGMI vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 84.78% return, which is significantly higher than CEPI's 20.71% return.
WGMI
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 40.03%
- YTD
- 84.78%
- 6M
- 55.52%
- 1Y
- 294.61%
- 3Y*
- 86.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEPI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 34.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 84.78% | 72.47% | -24.67% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 20.71% | 10.75% | -9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGMI and CEPI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between WGMI and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGMI vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank
WGMI
CEPI
WGMI vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGMI | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 1.52 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 3.62 | +8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGMI | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 1.28 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
WGMI vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and CEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGMI | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.76% | -29.48% | -56.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.94% | -22.47% | -28.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.08% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -8.65% | -34.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.08% | 9.43% | +15.65% |
Volatility
WGMI vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 20.10% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 5.92%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGMI | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.10% | 5.92% | +14.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.64% | 20.94% | +34.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.03% | 26.79% | +49.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.53% | 31.57% | +49.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.53% | 31.57% | +49.96% |
WGMI vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
WGMI vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison
WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 42.71% | 50.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGMI and CEPI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGMI has higher volatility (20.10%) compared to CEPI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs CEPI's -29.48%.
On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 294.61% vs 34.07% for CEPI. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 294.61% return vs 34.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.
They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.85% for CEPI.
WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGMI and CEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer