WGMI vs. BITS

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) and BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. WGMI is actively managed, while BITS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WGMI returned 44.13%/yr vs 30.18%/yr for BITS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITS.

Performance

WGMI vs. BITS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 38.49% return, which is significantly higher than BITS's -7.88% return.

WGMI

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -23.20%
• 6M: 8.30%
• YTD: 38.49%
• 1Y: 111.58%
• 3Y*: 44.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITS

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -11.58%
• 6M: -22.72%
• YTD: -7.88%
• 1Y: -11.28%
• 3Y*: 30.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. BITS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	38.49%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-82.94%
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-7.88%	14.90%	61.84%	212.23%	-72.62%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and BITS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.90

The correlation between WGMI and BITS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. BITS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 47
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 45
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 8
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. BITS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGMI	BITS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	-0.21	+1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	0.06	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.01	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	-0.23	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.37	-0.40	+4.77

WGMI vs. BITS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the BITS Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and BITS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. BITS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, roughly equal to the maximum BITS drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and BITS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	BITS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-83.11%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-48.38%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	-48.38%	-14.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.49%	-39.35%	+12.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.12%	-42.59%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.62%	28.51%	-2.89%

Volatility

WGMI vs. BITS - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 20.44% compared to Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) at 11.52%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	BITS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.44%	11.52%	+8.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.79%	40.41%	+15.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.46%	53.21%	+24.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.47%	60.64%	+20.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.47%	60.64%	+20.83%

WGMI vs. BITS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BITS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGMI vs. BITS - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	24.70%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and BITS in my portfolio?

WGMI and BITS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGMI or BITS?

WGMI has higher volatility (20.44%) compared to BITS (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs BITS's -83.11%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or BITS?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 44.13% vs 30.18% for BITS. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITS has been the lower-risk option at 11.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or BITS?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 44.13% return vs 30.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or BITS?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or BITS?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 24.70%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and BITS?

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.65% for BITS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.