PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGLD.DE vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while IAUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAUM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGLD.DE achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's 5.02% return.


WGLD.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
2.75%
6M
6.40%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*

IAUM

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
5.02%
6M
6.67%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
28.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WGLD.DE
WisdomTree Core Physical Gold
2.75%49.08%34.17%9.39%7.07%7.41%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
5.02%44.78%35.42%9.73%5.68%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WGLD.DE and IAUM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.81

The correlation between WGLD.DE and IAUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGLD.DE
WGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
WGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WGLD.DEIAUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.79

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

4.27

+0.33

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGLD.DE and IAUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WGLD.DEIAUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Drawdowns

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.58%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUM drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGLD.DE and IAUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGLD.DEIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-17.09%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.58%

-17.09%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.58%

-17.09%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.99%

-15.48%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-4.29%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

7.14%

-0.60%

Volatility

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 4.60%. This indicates that WGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGLD.DEIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

4.60%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

21.54%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

24.88%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.61%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.61%

-0.73%

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGLD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WGLD.DE vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither WGLD.DE nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WGLD.DE and IAUM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for WGLD.DE.

WGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while IAUM is Gold. WGLD.DE tracks Gold, while IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WGLD.DE and 0.09% for IAUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGLD.DE and IAUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer