WGFIX vs. WICGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WGFIX (William Blair Global Leaders Fund) and WICGX (William Blair China Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WGFIX is a Global Equities fund managed by William Blair, while WICGX is a China Equities fund managed by William Blair. Over the past 3 years, WGFIX returned 12.92%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for WICGX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WGFIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WICGX.

Performance

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGFIX achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than WICGX's 9.95% return.

WGFIX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

WICGX

• 1D: 3.46%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 6M: 10.71%
• 1Y: 25.92%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	8.46%	16.06%	7.52%	23.02%	-22.88%
WICGX William Blair China Growth Fund	9.95%	24.24%	10.36%	-24.29%	-26.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WGFIX and WICGX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.31

Return for Risk

WGFIX vs. WICGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGFIX

WGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
WGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

WICGX

WICGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
WICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
WICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
WICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) and William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGFIX	WICGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.28	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.85	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	2.05	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	5.71	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the WICGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGFIX and WICGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGFIX	WICGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.28	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	-0.16	+0.51

Drawdowns

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGFIX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than WICGX's maximum drawdown of -50.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGFIX and WICGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGFIX	WICGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.51%	-50.35%	-9.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-13.55%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-25.23%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-17.14%	+16.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-32.34%	+20.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	4.83%	-1.55%

Volatility

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) is 3.84%, while William Blair China Growth Fund (WICGX) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that WGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WICGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGFIX	WICGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	7.71%	-3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	15.49%	-4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	21.58%	-8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	24.83%	-6.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.86%	24.83%	-5.97%

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGFIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than WICGX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGFIX vs. WICGX - Dividend Comparison

WGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.86%, more than WICGX's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	78.86%	85.53%	54.25%	6.65%	2.17%	5.65%	12.57%	1.35%	17.62%	4.24%	0.72%	5.05%
WICGX William Blair China Growth Fund	0.76%	0.84%	1.38%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGFIX and WICGX in my portfolio?

WGFIX and WICGX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGFIX or WICGX?

WICGX has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to WGFIX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGFIX dropped -59.51% vs WICGX's -50.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.