PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGCFX vs. ESPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) and Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGCFX achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than ESPAX's 13.11% return.


WGCFX

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.78%
6M
3.83%
YTD
7.40%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.70%

ESPAX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.90%
6M
6.87%
YTD
13.11%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
7.96%
ALL TIME*
8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WGCFX
Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund
7.40%14.99%10.56%13.82%-17.36%14.27%16.60%20.27%-8.64%18.13%
ESPAX
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund
13.11%-3.10%6.44%18.65%-13.94%27.61%1.16%28.03%-13.77%11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between WGCFX and ESPAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.74

The correlation between WGCFX and ESPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGCFX vs. ESPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WGCFX
WGCFX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WGCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
WGCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPAX
ESPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ESPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) and Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WGCFXESPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.09

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

3.21

+4.22

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the ESPAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGCFX and ESPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGCFX drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum ESPAX drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGCFX and ESPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGCFXESPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-61.14%

+38.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-13.58%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

-24.80%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-26.84%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-2.97%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-9.11%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

4.62%

-2.63%

Volatility

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund (WGCFX) is 3.82%, while Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that WGCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGCFXESPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.56%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

12.30%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

17.60%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

20.16%

-9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.53%

21.37%

-9.84%

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

WGCFX vs. ESPAX - Dividend Comparison

WGCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than ESPAX's 7.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPAX
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund
7.30%8.26%10.10%2.07%6.24%6.34%0.39%1.68%7.90%5.33%2.25%2.33%
WGCFX
Allspring Spectrum Growth Fund
7.60%8.17%6.22%0.26%6.87%13.28%11.04%0.60%18.34%13.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WGCFX and ESPAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESPAX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to WGCFX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGCFX dropped -22.60% vs ESPAX's -61.14%.

WGCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGCFX and ESPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer