PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFSPX vs. LIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFSPX achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than LIVIX's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, WFSPX has outperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 15.53%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.


WFSPX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.54%
6M
11.91%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
15.53%

LIVIX

1D
0.25%
1M
4.52%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.54%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
12.57%21.57%13.60%21.62%-18.38%18.75%14.99%26.76%-7.83%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WFSPX and LIVIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

0.96

The correlation between WFSPX and LIVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFSPX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LIVIX
LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFSPXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

2.44

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

3.39

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.22

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.81

14.28

+1.53

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFSPX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFSPXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.44

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.65

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.72

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.64

-0.51

Drawdowns

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFSPX drawdown since its inception was -58.21%, which is greater than LIVIX's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFSPX and LIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFSPXLIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.21%

-34.44%

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.44%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-17.39%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-26.45%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-34.44%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-4.52%

-8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.13%

-0.23%

Volatility

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) is 2.82%, while BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that WFSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFSPXLIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.85%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

10.06%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

12.56%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

15.84%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

16.72%

+1.30%

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFSPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WFSPX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

WFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than LIVIX's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
2.20%2.48%0.01%2.04%1.96%2.04%1.56%2.95%2.35%2.27%1.54%2.88%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.57%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, WFSPX and LIVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIVIX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFSPX dropped -58.21% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFSPX and LIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer