WFPAX vs. EKJAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX).
WFPAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jul 31, 2007. EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998.
Performance
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 3.09% | 5.81% | 11.58% | 9.17% | -4.95% | 28.14% | 2.93% | 39.96% | -13.42% | 10.82% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -9.45% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | 34.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFPAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly higher than EKJAX's -9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WFPAX has underperformed EKJAX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while EKJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.64% annualized return.
WFPAX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
EKJAX
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -9.45%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFPAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than EKJAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WFPAX vs. EKJAX — Risk / Return Rank
WFPAX
EKJAX
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFPAX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.19 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 0.96 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 3.16 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFPAX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.24 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between WFPAX and EKJAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Dividend Comparison
WFPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than EKJAX's 35.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 11.04% | 11.38% | 7.97% | 5.39% | 8.69% | 9.86% | 0.36% | 7.38% | 2.40% | 4.14% | 1.08% | 4.14% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 35.79% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
Drawdowns
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFPAX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, smaller than the maximum EKJAX drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFPAX and EKJAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFPAX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.20% | -59.70% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -18.10% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -50.43% | +27.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -50.43% | +6.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -14.60% | +7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -20.68% | +11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 5.49% | -2.17% |
Volatility
WFPAX vs. EKJAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) is 5.59%, while Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that WFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WFPAX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 8.22% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 14.34% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 23.95% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 27.97% | -10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 25.33% | -6.43% |