PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFMIX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFMIX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFMIX having a 10.78% annualized return and VMFVX not far behind at 10.51%.


WFMIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.81%
YTD
10.77%
6M
9.77%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
10.78%

VMFVX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.72%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.77%6.14%11.95%9.54%-4.65%28.53%3.27%40.27%-13.12%11.16%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.01%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WFMIX and VMFVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.94

The correlation between WFMIX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFMIX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFMIX
WFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFMIXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.99

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

6.85

-0.48

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFMIX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFMIXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.39

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.52

-0.05

Drawdowns

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFMIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFMIX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFMIXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.70%

-45.79%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-10.52%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-22.46%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

-22.46%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

-45.79%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.35%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-5.48%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.05%

-0.12%

Volatility

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFMIXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.87%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.50%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

15.13%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

19.47%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

21.88%

-2.98%

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFMIX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

WFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than VMFVX's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.73%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.15%11.24%8.00%5.51%8.71%9.87%0.66%7.48%2.74%4.41%1.44%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WFMIX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to WFMIX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFMIX dropped -52.70% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFMIX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer