WFH vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
WFH and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WFH is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Solactive Remote Work Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2020. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both WFH and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WFH vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WFH vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.00% | 15.47% | 18.55% | 6.91% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 12.20% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Returns By Period
WFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 5.84%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 33.13%
- 1Y
- 95.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFH vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WFH vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
WFH
CHPS
WFH vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFH | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.98 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between WFH and CHPS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WFH vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than CHPS's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.79% | 0.86% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WFH vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFH | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.68% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.63% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility
WFH vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WFH | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 37.67% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 32.80% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.80% | — |