PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFH vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WFH vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WFH vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.00%15.47%18.55%6.91%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
12.20%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Returns By Period


WFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS

1D
5.84%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
12.20%
6M
33.13%
1Y
95.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WFH vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WFH vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFH

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFH vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WFH vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and CHPS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WFH vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than CHPS's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.91%0.94%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.86%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WFH vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

Volatility

WFH vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WFHCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.80%