PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFGGX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFGGX achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 8.38% return.


WFGGX

1D
0.36%
1M
4.84%
6M
8.12%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
15.06%

GQFPX

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.72%
6M
8.29%
YTD
8.38%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WFGGX
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund
13.05%24.09%30.71%26.13%-30.75%5.67%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
8.38%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WFGGX and GQFPX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.47

The correlation between WFGGX and GQFPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFGGX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFGGX
WFGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WFGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WFGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFGGXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.20

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

5.84

+3.09

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFGGX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFGGX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFGGX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFGGXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.91%

-16.95%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-6.28%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-10.57%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.91%

-16.95%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-4.31%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-3.04%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.35%

+0.73%

Volatility

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 4.38%. This indicates that WFGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFGGXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

4.38%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

8.43%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

10.16%

+9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

12.85%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

12.85%

+6.32%

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFGGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFGGX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

WFGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than GQFPX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.68%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFGGX
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund
3.32%3.75%4.75%0.00%3.58%10.47%3.41%1.77%2.93%1.49%12.79%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFGGX and GQFPX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFGGX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to GQFPX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFGGX dropped -36.91% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

WFGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFGGX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer