PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WF vs. HSBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WF vs. HSBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WF achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than HSBC's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WF has underperformed HSBC with an annualized return of 13.01%, while HSBC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.


WF

1D
2.30%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
5.94%
6M
10.62%
1Y
39.84%
3Y*
39.21%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*
13.01%

HSBC

1D
2.15%
1M
2.72%
YTD
21.78%
6M
27.76%
1Y
64.27%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
32.55%
10Y*
18.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WF vs. HSBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
5.94%99.65%16.76%13.14%-7.19%18.91%-9.52%-28.16%-5.75%40.44%
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
21.78%67.91%34.48%39.45%7.79%20.76%-31.71%1.44%-16.05%36.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WF and HSBC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WF:

$16.13B

HSBC:

$320.51B

EPS

WF:

₩12.69K

HSBC:

$6.38

PE Ratio

WF:

7.46

HSBC:

14.52

PEG Ratio

WF:

1.06

HSBC:

0.71

PS Ratio

WF:

1.68

HSBC:

2.52

PB Ratio

WF:

0.72

HSBC:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

WF:

₩14.13T

HSBC:

$128.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WF:

₩7.05T

HSBC:

$65.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

WF:

₩4.72T

HSBC:

$34.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WF vs. HSBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WF
WF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBC
HSBC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WF vs. HSBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFHSBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.80

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

13.41

-10.29

WF vs. HSBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WF Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the HSBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WF and HSBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WF vs. HSBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WF drawdown since its inception was -89.46%, which is greater than HSBC's maximum drawdown of -74.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WF and HSBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHSBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.46%

-74.47%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.99%

-16.28%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.99%

-21.83%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.52%

-31.80%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.84%

-62.26%

-8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-2.67%

-23.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-24.09%

-18.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.45%

4.61%

+7.84%

Volatility

WF vs. HSBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) is 9.16%, while HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that WF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHSBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

10.18%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.06%

22.25%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.04%

27.11%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.02%

25.95%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.47%

25.62%

+7.85%

Dividends

WF vs. HSBC - Dividend Comparison

WF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than HSBC's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
4.05%4.19%8.29%6.54%4.33%3.65%4.05%6.52%6.20%4.94%6.35%6.33%
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
0.69%3.84%12.93%2.71%8.20%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%3.29%7.86%

Financials

WF vs. HSBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woori Financial Group Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00T7.00T20222023202420252026
847.95B
32.92B
(WF) Total Revenue
(HSBC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WF values in KRW, HSBC values in USD

WF vs. HSBC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woori Financial Group Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
51.4%
Portfolio components
WF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 847.95B and revenue of 847.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

HSBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 16.93B and revenue of 32.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

WF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 847.95B and revenue of 847.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

HSBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.36B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

WF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woori Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 638.92B and revenue of 847.95B, resulting in a net margin of 75.4%.

HSBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.33B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WF and HSBC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSBC has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to WF (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WF dropped -89.46% vs HSBC's -74.47%.

HSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WF and HSBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer