PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WF vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WF vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WF vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
13.28%99.65%16.76%13.14%-7.19%18.91%-9.52%-28.16%-5.75%40.44%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
-10.37%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WF achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WF has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 14.20%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.


WF

1D
3.66%
1M
-11.27%
YTD
13.28%
6M
18.61%
1Y
103.45%
3Y*
46.26%
5Y*
27.21%
10Y*
14.20%

VUG

1D
4.00%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.37%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WF vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WF
WF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
WF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
WF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WF vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

0.81

+2.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

1.31

+2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.18

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

1.11

+3.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.29

3.96

+10.33

WF vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WF Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WF and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

0.81

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.57

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between WF and VUG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WF vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

WF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than VUG's 0.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WF
Woori Financial Group Inc.
1.30%3.84%12.93%2.71%8.20%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%3.29%7.86%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.46%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Drawdowns

WF vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WF drawdown since its inception was -89.46%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WF and VUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WFVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.46%

-50.68%

-38.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.94%

-16.53%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.52%

-35.61%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.84%

-35.61%

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.16%

-13.20%

-7.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-7.13%

-35.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

4.66%

+2.60%

Volatility

WF vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 7.00%. This indicates that WF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WFVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.87%

7.00%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

12.65%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.68%

22.68%

+11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.02%

22.23%

+8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.24%

21.38%

+11.86%